Prediction of Lois Boisson [266th] vs Caroline Garcia [99th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L W W W L
Form
L L L W L L W L W LH2H: Boisson 0 - 0 Garcia
| Boisson | Stats | Garcia |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (10-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (3-6) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 266 | Ranking | 99 |
| 152 | Highest Rank | 4 |
| 21 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 13 |
| 62% (126-77) | Career Total W/L | 56% (462-358) |
| $25,600 | Career Prize Money | $10,378,106 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lois Boisson vs Caroline Garcia Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Boisson 0 - 0 Garcia
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Boisson has won 37.92% of points on their second serve, while Garcia has won 40.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Boisson, in recent form, has won 49.24% of their opponent's second serve points, while Garcia has won 44.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.15% and 28.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Boisson has saved 55.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Garcia has saved 38.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Boisson has won 73.08% of matches played (W/L 19/ 7), with Garcia winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Boisson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 93/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 22/ 28). Garcia has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 52/ 29), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 225/ 191).
- Player level: In the last year, Boisson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 19/ 7), where as Garcia has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 5/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Boisson has played against opponents with an average rank of 301.58 while Garcia has played against players with an average rank of 120.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Boisson has won 82% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Garcia has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Boisson has converted 30.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Garcia has converted 35.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Lois Boisson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Lois Boisson
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
41
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Marie Benoit
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Alevtina Ibragimova
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
10 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
37
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Deborah Chiesa
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lilli Tagger
Player
Lois Boisson
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
45
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Diana Martynov
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Alina Charaeva
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Caroline Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Caroline Garcia
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Anna Bondar
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
64)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Caroline Garcia
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Bernarda Pera
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marketa Vondrousova
Player
Caroline Garcia
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Caroline Garcia
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Yue Yuan
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Caroline Garcia
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Caroline Garcia
51%
(
41 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Caroline Garcia
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
1
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Boisson vs Garcia?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Boisson Vs Garcia is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (126/77) | Win/Loss | 56% (462/358) |
| 58% (272/201) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1043/879) |
| 54% (2327/1981) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (9393/8896) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 544 | Aces Total | 3500 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 821 | Total Double Faults | 2423 |
| 1:30:14 | Average Match Time | 1:25:46 |
| 380.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.01 |
| 61% (7710/12574) | 1st Serve % | 62% (32358/52428) |
| 65% (5045/7710) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (21763/32358) |
| 45% (2202/4865) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (9692/20059) |
| 50% (750/1507) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2253/5382) |
| 46% (5591/12172) | Return Points Win % | 41% (20857/51412) |
| 62% (123/199) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (459/815) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (14/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (127/242) |
| 69% (47/68) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (165/287) |
| 90% (117/105) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (460/382) |
| 9% (117/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (460/75) |
| 24% (86/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (360/78) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Lois Boisson
View full predicted draw for Boisson in Rouen
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Caroline Garcia
View full predicted draw for Garcia in Rouen
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
